Where is your operation losing hours?
Pick your sector and the tasks that hurt. You get the workflows worth automating first — and a fair view of which ones are not worth it yet.
Find your candidate workflows
Candidates, not recommendations
This tool identifies candidate opportunities only. It shortlists the workflows in your sector that are most often worth examining — it does not recommend automating any of them.
Not every candidate should be automated. Several of the workflows listed are better fixed by redesigning the process, by connecting two systems, or by conventional software. Some should be left alone.
Before anything is implemented, five things have to be assessed against your actual operation: data quality, process ownership, exception handling, security and access control, and the level of human review each step needs. None of them is visible to this tool.
How to read this tool
- You entered Figures you typed or selected. Nothing is pre-filled from client data.
- Illustrative assumption A planning percentage you control. Not measured across client engagements.
- Calculated output Arithmetic applied to the two rows above, shown in full below.
- Verified client result None. No figure in this tool comes from a client engagement.
This tool provides an illustrative planning estimate based on the information and assumptions entered. It is not a forecast, quotation, professional advice, or guarantee of business results.
How the estimate is calculated
- Candidate workflows are matched to the sector and pain points you select, from a fixed list.
- The impact label is a general indication of typical effort against typical benefit, not a prediction for your business.
- Nothing here is drawn from a client engagement, and no result is attributed to one.
- Whether a candidate is genuinely worth automating depends on your volumes, data quality, process ownership, security requirements and exception rates — none of which this tool can see.